1、西南師范大學碩士學位論文創(chuàng)造性智力測試維度的初步構建姓名：徐展申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：教育心理學指導教師：張慶林2000.5.1——型蘭：些塑壟型苧堡壘塑塑生塑塞苧!壅ConstructionofDimensionsinCreativeIntelligenceTestMajor：Educa￡『onalPsychologyTutor：Pro『bssorZhangQinglinAbstractSpeciality：ThinkingandCr

2、eativityAuthor：XuZhanAdefinitionofcreativityacceptedbyallhasnotcomeoutsofarhewevertheresearchoncreativityisgraduallypaidmoreattentiontoandtheimportanceofinnovationforsocietyorindividualiSrealizedPsychologistsputforwardma

3、nynewtheories曲outcreativityinrecentyearsThe“dationshipbetweencreativityandintelligence，aboutwhichthere嘣edifferentopinions，wasnotonbthefocusofresearchoncreativitybutalsothekeyintheintelligencetheoriesSteinberg(19ss1996)po

4、sedhisTriarchicIntelligenceTheoryandhethoughtCreativeIntelligence(CDiSaparticularcomponentofintelligencewhichiSdifferentfromclassicintdligenceZhangQinglinandStcrnberg(1999)conceivedaconstructionofdimensionsinCreativeInte

5、lligenceTest(CIT)thatincludedfivefactors：HypothesistestingInsight，NovelDesignSetReliefandCriticalThinking，andthreetypesofhems：quantitative，figuralandverbalIIltIliSresearchWeplanedtolllakeaConfirmatoryFactorAnalysis(CFA)b

6、asedonthesupposedconstructionofCITAtthesanletime，wewouldcompareCITwiththedivergentthinkingtestandgeneralintelligencetestWjpredictedthatonesscoreinC1TwouldbelowlyrelatedtogeneralIQandmoderatelyrelatedtoitinthedivergentthi

7、nkingtestThisresearchwouldchallengetheclassicandconfirmthelatestintelligencetheoriesanditwouldnotonlyfdlthevacuityoftheresearchconcernedinOUrstatebutalsoimprovetheevaluativetoolsofcreativegeniuses250studentsinSWNUweretes

8、tedwithC豫Tl犯subjectsweredividedintotwogroups，12studentsintheprizegroupand238inthenonprizegroup(thesubjectsintheprizegroupwereprizedintheNationalSciencetechCompetitioninUniversitiesnamedChallengeCup)，including129maleand12

9、1femalesubjectsInadditionthesubjectsinthenonprizegroupworetestedwithTorranceTestofCreativeThinking(TTCT)andCaneflCrossculturalIntelligenceTest(CCIT)Wegotthefindingsinthegivenconditionasfollowing：(1)ThroughCFAWefoundoverl

10、apinthefivefactorsaccordingtothesupposedconstructionandthereWasSomeinherentrelationshipbetweenS吐ReliefandCriticaIThinkingandtheymustbecombinedintoonewhichwastemporarilynamedSet—criticismTheCITconsistedoffourdimensions：Hy

11、pothesistesting，Insight，NovelDesignandSet—criticismAlltheitems’10adingvaluesweresignificantlyhighonthefourfactorsinthenewmedel，thatwastosayitwasanacceptablemodel(2)CⅡhadgoodreliabilityandvalidityItreducedthefaultofgenera