1、字數：英文 字數：英文 3400 3400 單詞， 單詞，18816 18816 字符；中文 字符；中文 5768 5768 漢字 漢字出處： 出處：Hristov Hristov K. K. Internet Internet plus plus policy: policy: A study study on on how how China China can can achieve achieve economic econom

2、ic growth growth through through the the internet internet of of things[J]. things[J]. Journal Journal of of Science Science and and Technology Technology Policy Policy Management, Management, 2017, 2017, 8(3):

3、 8(3): 375-386 375-386外文文獻： 外文文獻： Internet plus policy: a study on how China can achieve economic growth through the internet of thingsAbstract Purpose—The purpose of this paper is to analyze and determine the best cour

4、se of action for policymakers in China when dealing with the implementation of best practices for the internet of things (IoT). The recently introduced Internet Plus strategy is an attempt by Chinese policymakers to boos

5、t the Chinese economy by diminishing its reliance on manufacturing and export in favor of a knowledge-based economy driven by services and the tech sector. The IoT is arguably one of the key drivers behind this transform

6、ation.Design/methodology/approach—This paper conducts an analysis of existing literature on the IoT and uses two complimentary theories, resource-based view and dynamic capabilities theory, to determine a set of policy r

7、ecommendations.Findings—A cooperative relationship between policymakers, start-up firms and academia is essential to the success of the IoT. The artificial intelligence industry also plays a key role in the development o

8、f the IoT and requires strategic funding and favorable policy. Finally, established and cost-effective standards and practices are much more likely to be effective than new and costly alternatives.Originality/value—This

9、paper examines the newly established field of the IoT The IoT may manifest itself within a number of products and services spread across a diverse range of fields. From intelligent management of factories and firms to se

10、lf-driving cars and smart cities, the possibilities are virtually endless. The economic benefits associated with these possibilities are too significant to be ignored and warrant further consideration in future research

11、on the IoT.The leading industries with economic value at stake in the near future are manufacturing at 27%; retail trade at 11%; information services at 9%; and finance and insurance, also at 9% of the overall IoT market

12、 (Lee and Lee, 2015). Most of the perceived value in manufacturing comes from the added agility and flexibility in factories, while the value in retail is derived from connected marketing and advertising (Lee and Lee, 20

13、15). It is no surprise that Atzori et al. (2010) see the IoT as a promising innovation which pervades nearly every aspect of our lives. The IoT has also piqued the interest of multiple governments and leading IT companie

14、s who view the concept as a key driver of future economic growth and sustainability (Palattella et al., 2012).After taking into consideration the remarkable future potential of the Internet of Things, it is surprising to

15、 note that very few laws around the world deal directly with the IoT regulation and implementation. Most laws currently in place are only concerned with basic data protection and do not address any specific challenges wh

16、ich may arise from an internet of connected devices (Weber, 2015). The few legislators who have taken on the task of IoT policy formulation have limited their work to privacy and security concerns (Weber, 2015), vastly i

17、gnoring the need for a standardized technical structure and best practices. As a result, this paper attempts to determine the challenges limiting the implementation and development of the IoT on a wider scale.The remaind

18、er of this paper is structured in the following manner. The author begins by familiarizing the reader with the RBV theory and its dynamic capabilities approach. Next, in the Findings section of this paper, the current is