1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論貪污罪客觀要件姓名：謝開軍申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律指導(dǎo)教師：黃庭生20020401AbstractAsatypicalposteconomiccrimecorruptionoffeneehasserioussocialharmfulnessNotonlydoesitmakealOSSonpublicpropertybutalsodisruptsthehonestyofpostactivitiesSoinChin

2、aitSalwaysthehitemphasisinthefightagainstcorruptionOnthebasisofsummingupSUCCESSfulexperiencesandhistoricallessonofeverylegislatioifthenewCriminalLawofthePeople’SRepublicofChinastipulatestheconstituenttraitsofcorruptiontr

3、improvisionbyprovisionAlthotighacademiccircleshaveprobedmuchintothecorruptionoffence，therearestillsomecontroversiesovertheobiectiverequisitestoconstitutethiscrime，whichdirectlyaffectstheunityoflawenforcementandtheauthori

4、tyoflawInorderteachtheaimofstrictandunitedlawenforcement，thisarticle，whichiSdividedintofourpartsexpoundstheobjectiverequisitesofthecorruptioncrimerelativelywideanddeepfromtheangleofexplanatorymethodologyThisarticleadhere

5、stotheprinciplesofintegrationoftheorywithpractice，takesourrecentlegislationofcorruptionasbasispoint，usesthemethodsofcomparison，analysisandsynthesisandfollowsthemaincluetakeadvantageofone’Spositionandpowerillegallypossess

6、publicpropertyquitebigamountOnthebasisofprobingintothelegislativehistoryofcorruptionanddrawingachievementsfromotherstheauthorresearchesintothemeaningof?！痯ost”thespecificpropertyof‘。convenience’’andtherelationsbetweenthec

7、onvenienceofport，convenienceofservicesandconvenienceofotherpersonspost；expoundsthemeaningandcharacteristicsofillegalpossession，conceptionsofembezzle，stealdefraudandothermethodsanddifferencesbetweentheconceptionsabove，and

8、therelationsbetweentheobjectsofembezzling，stealing，defraudingandactorsposition；inquiresuntothedefinitionoftheobjectofcorruption，typesofpublicpropertyandthedistinguishingofthequalityofblendedproperty；discussesthatquitebig

9、amountiSoneoftheobjectiverequisitestoconstitutethecorruptioncrimeandthatquitebigamountiSnotconfinedtotheactualillegalowningamountandhowtoaddupthecorruptionamountandthatexpenditurefor0塌cialbusinessshouldnotoffsetcorruptio